• Careers
  • Alumni
  • Giving
  • Media
  • Sign In
SIS | LMS
AOU Logo Apply Now
  • About
  • Academics
  • Admission
  • Students
  • Research
  • Centers

Careers
Alumni
Giving
Media
SIS
LMS
Apply Now
عربي 
Lebanon flag
Back
  • Director Message
  • Vision, Mission and Values
  • Strategic Plan
  • Top Management
  • Centers
  • Organizational Structure
  • Units and Departments
  • OU Partnership
  • Accreditation
  • International Relations
  • Regulations
  • AOU Teaching and Learning Model
  • Publications
  • Gallery
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Projects And Initiatives
  • Sustainable Development
  • Privacy Note
Back
Faculty of Business Studies
Faculty of
Business Studies
Faculty of Computer Studies
Faculty of
Computer Studies
Faculty of Language Studies
Faculty of
Language Studies
Faculty of Education
Faculty of
Education
Graphic and Multimedia Design Technology
Graphic and Multimedia
Design Technology
Back
  • Home
  • Student Services
  • LMS
  • University Bulletins
  • Library & Learning Resources
  • Academic Calendar
  • Student Guide
  • Examinations
  • Students Affairs
  • Student Funds
  • Student Life
  • Student Email
  • FAQs
  • Student Complaint (FAQ)
  • Honor’s List
Back
  • Undergraduate Programs
  • Admission Requirements
  • Tuition Fees
  • Apply
  • FAQ for Admission and Registration
  • Graduate Programs
  • Admission Requirements
  • Tuition Fees
  • Apply
  • FAQ for Admission and Registration
  • Why Study at AOU
  • Terms and Conditions
Back
  • Research
  • Vision and Mission
  • Research & Development Committee
  • Research Centers
  • Meet Our Researchers
  • CALR Linguistics Journal
  • Conferences
  • Highlights
  • Research Bylaws
  • Research Forms
  • Awards
  • Student Research (Theses & Projects)
  • Recent
Back
  • Privacy Note
Back
  • Academic and Continuing Education Center (ACEC)
  • Writing Center
  • English speaking skills center
  • Entrepreneurship Center
Back
  • Donors
  • Why Donate?
  • Where to Give?
  • How to Give?
Back
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Announcements
  • Success Stories
  • Career Opportunities
    AOU - Lebanon / Research / CALR Linguistics Journal / CALR - Issue 14

CALR Linguistics Journal

CALR Linguistics Journal

  • CALR Linguistics Journal
  • CALR publication ethics and malpractice statement
  • CALR Issues
    • CALR - Volume 16-Issue 2
    • CALR - Volume 16-Issue 1
    • CALR - Issue 15
    • CALR - Issue 14
    • CALR - Issue 13
    • CALR - Issue 12
    • CALR - Issue 11
    • CALR - Issue 10
    • CALR - Issue 9
    • CALR - Issue 8
    • CALR - Issue 7 Annex
    • CALR - Issue 7
    • CALR - Issue 6
    • CALR - Issue 5
    • CALR - Issue 4
    • CALR - Issue 3
    • CALR - Issue 2
    • CALR - Issue 1
  • CALR about
  • Call for Papers
  • Board & Affiliation
  • Author's guide
  • Online Resources
  • Gallery
  • Recent
    • Conference Call for Papers
    Toggle Sidebar

    CALR - Issue 14

    • WhatsApp
    • Copy Link
    Link copied!
    Page Image
    Page Content

    ​​​​CALR-Issue-14.jpg​​


    ​Forward by the editor​​

    Language practitioners have been entrusted with the responsibility of preparing generations of learners in competent oral and written communication. The approaches have been varied and the theories of teaching and learning a language have been in a constant state of flux. As a result, research has underlined an overlap with practice, oscillating between pedagogic and linguistic foci and bringing a spectrum of interpretations to any phenomenon under observation (Beveridge & Stevens 2020; BERA-RSA Inquiry 2013). Consequently, in recent studies, research-based debates on whether there is or should be a relation between research and educational practice, have become an integral part of the language practitioner professionalism (Dekker & Meeter 2022; Mills 2020;  Vanderlinde & van Braak, 2010). However, the nature of the required research and its relationship to educational practice remains unclear (Leow, Thinglum, Havenne & Tseng 2022; Alazmi & Alazmi 2022).

    Whether the language practitioners need to reinforce their practice with research knowledge or whether teaching can rely solely on the coordinators' instructions and the implementation of the provided curriculum, continue to underpin the debate. The Centre for Applied Linguistics Research (CALR) at the Arab Open University, invited linguists, researchers and educationists to probe into the role of research in teaching and learning. Contributors to this volume present or reflect on their experience in pursuit of evidence about the role that research-informed practices have contributed to teaching and learning. Alternatively, they can reflect on evidence of research-free successful practical approaches. In particular, researchers have presented working papers, research articles and case studies on:

    • The intersection between teaching and research, and its implications
    • The role of research in knowledge building
    • Researchers' experiences, particularly in relation to the English language classroom
    • How research on teaching can inform linguistic and pedagogic practices and policies
    • The overlap between research-informed practice and effective language teaching.

     

    We hope that you enjoy this issue. Our next call for papers will be out in April 2024.

     

    CALR Linguistics Journal is an ISSN referenced and indexed journal in the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH Plus). ISSN number 2073-1175.

     

    Editor-in-Chief

    Hayat Al-Khatib, Professor of Applied Linguistics

    Arab Open University – Lebanon

    hkhatib@aou.edu.lb

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/YJQJ1156​



    LIST OF ARTICLES


    Implementing CLIL in a Japanese prefectural university: Reflecting on research-based pedagogy 

    Author: 

    John Lindsay Adamson      adamson@unii.ac.jp

    Patrick Chin Leong Ng      chin@unii.ac.jp  

    University of Niigata Prefecture, Japan


    This study investigated the beliefs and practices of two English language teachers - an English as an Additional Language (EAL) speaker and an Anglophone speaker - towards Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at a regional Japanese university offering English medium instruction (EMI). Established in 2009, the university offers students EMI in the fields of international studies and regional development and international economy and prepares 1st grade students in a compulsory English for Academic Purposes (EAP) programme adopting a CLIL approach.

    This study examined how the two teachers conceptualized and implemented their CLIL syllabi and what limitations and opportunities CLIL offered. Qualitative data elicited from a collaborative autoethnography (CAE) revealed CLIL as both a bridge into EMI and post-university life. For this purpose, both teachers scaffolded language and content materials, especially with general cultural and social science themes. Translanguaging was important in developing pragmatic integration of students' Japanese in classes. Difficulties were noted in teaching higher cognitive skills due to the test focus of secondary education. Pedagogically, both shifted along a CLIL continuum between language and content foci according to student needs. The perceived limitations stressed the problematic balance between content and language and a lack of a language threshold before embarking on CLIL. Further issues raised were the paucity of teacher development in CLIL and tension between content and language teachers in syllabus design. Finally, opportunities were mentioned in the knowledge transfer between content and  language classes and the development of autonomous collaboration. Of final note, the teachers' linguistic backgrounds were seen as important for students. Overall, implications for this study suggested that teaching practitioners can reinforce their classroom instructions with research knowledge.


    Download link: Article 1.pdf


    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/NXAS1779


    Research, teaching and time: teacher practices and possibilities


    Author: ​Dr Andrew G Scott [a.scott2@uq.edu.au]

    The University of Queensland, Australia

    ​

    Issues around the relationship between teachers and research have long been a topic of debate in the literature (Bartels, 2003; Borg, 2009, 2010; Erlam, 2008; Hall, 2023; Korthagen, 2007; Levin, 2013; Lightbown, 1985; Marsden & Kasprowicz, 2017; McIntyre 2005; McKinley 2019; Medgyes, 2017; Nassaji, 2012). There is a relationship between research and educational practice but it is complex and nuanced. Teachers engage with research through teaching, using research, often indirectly, to inform their professional practice. This paper argues that an explanatory framework (Maton, 2014) that can account for this complexity is required to understand the relationship between research and teaching; knowledge from sites of knowledge production such as university research centres is recontextualised by state education departments and educational publishers before being incorporated into classroom discourse (Bernstein, 2000; Maton, 2014). The paper then argues that a teachers' professional life cycle (Huberman, 1989) must be considered to ensure any more direct engagement with research is likely to be of benefit. Finally, the paper argues that teachers as practitioner researchers presents a possible way of more closely linking research and educational practice.

    Key words: knowledge, pedagogic discourse, professional life cycles,  practitioner researcher

    ​Download link: Article 2.pdf

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/NWJG6218


    Addressing the Gap: Educational Research and its Implementation


    ​Author: Dr Rula Yazigy

    Professor of English

    The Lebanese University

    ynroula@ul.edu.lb

    Education is an essential feature of every civilization as it attempts to develop the various aspects of knowledge of the community. Research in education is a significant topic for study itself to connect research and practice in Education. Therefore, research in education must become a priority as it bridges the existence of any gap between the findings of research and the implementation of the recommendations, and to limit any future possibility of its existence. The applicability of research findings is not whether it leads to clear implications for practice, but also whether the implications will materialise in the educational setting and whether the stakeholders will accommodate to the required changes (Bridges, 2015). This paper offers some definitions of educational research and its characteristics, types and levels of educational, and investigates its limitations in practice-  the gap between research and practice. There is reference to research in higher education in the Arab world in general and Lebanon in particular. Suggestions are made to support the connection between educational research and educational practice mainly through Research-Practice collaboration. These include the need to support researchers by various bodies in the  education field such as universities, governmental institutions, research centers and educational organisations, and more importantly to offer the findings and follow up the implementation practices to help practitioners overcome the real world problems.


    ​Key words: applied research, educational research, educational practice, educational research in the Arab countries, educational research in Lebanon

    ​Download link: Article 3.pdf

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/TTXN1073


    Towards Optimal English Language Teaching and Learning: Dependence on or Independence from Research-based Practices 

    Author:  Catherine Bou Nasr [catherineelandary@gmail.com]

    Doctorate School – The Lebanese University                                                                                                                        ​

    Despite the universal urgent appeal to close the gap between researchers and language practitioners in attempts to better enable effective language instruction and professional pedagogical assistance, proposing discernible solutions remains one of the most difficult conundrums, even for experts. Therefore, the present study aimed to methodically investigate and explore the perspectives and decision-making skills of forty U.S. English language educators, who have different teaching experiences at different types of institutions and grade levels, with respect to either implementing instructional and educational research findings in their teaching methodology or not. The research data were anonymously collected through a causal- comparative survey and analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively by inspecting the participants' answers to pre-structured closed and open-ended questions. The findings indicated that, regardless of teaching backgrounds, the majority (80%) of U.S. English language educators (group A) implement research-based findings as well as abide by state, board of education, and school standards at the same time; whereas (20%) of teachers (group B) follow a research-free teaching approach. Moreover, participants of both groups (A&B) reported similar learning outcomes (in terms of meeting learning objectives, students' grades/engagement/participation). Eventually, the criterion of 'experience' was mostly affecting the successful application of and satisfaction with research practices, where 21.8% of Group A teachers (71.4% of them are novice) admitted not attaining similar results to those reported in the research findings; while 78.2% of the same group (90% are experienced/expert) gave a detailed and extensive description and reported attaining pretty similar results after critically 'adapting', not merely 'adopting', research data to meet their lessons objectives, unique classrooms settings, state requirements and students' interests. The study concludes with a provisional call to start a regional/state-wide/national/or even international database platform, where existing research papers are updated by comparing and contrasting researchers' findings with practitioners' feedback, test results, and/or suggestions after clinically following the same research methodology in their classrooms to deduce the reasons behind reaching similar/different outcomes.

    Key words: effective English language teaching/learning, successful research-based/free practices, years of experience, grade level, public/ private schools.​

    Download link: Article 4.pdf

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/WEGU5042


    The Unwholesomeness of the Scientific Ecosystem in the  Research Misconduct: A Breach of Duty

    ​Author: Dr. Laurence Ajaka 

    The Holy Spirit University of Kaslik

     laurenceajaka@usek.edu.lb

    Professor Joseph Saab

    The Holy Spirit University of Kaslik

    josephsaab@usek.edu.lb

    Science is an important fixture in the human experience, and it has emerged from the shrouds of magic and fallacies. Science is now how humans come to understand the world around them. It is also the basis for the evolution and technological advancement of today's

    society. There are two major schools of thought in science: the inductive and the deductive (Wills, 2022). The latter has received wider acceptance and governs the experimentation (Wang et al., 2020). However, this process is marred by scientific misconduct when some researchers do not adhere to the rules of science for a variety of reasons (Lee, 2016). This threatens to compromise the integrity of our technological status and might even lead to catastrophic consequences. Examples include the fraudulent study on the cancer-fighting properties of plants published by Dr. M.D. Anderson (Ackerman, 2012) and Joachim Boldt published studies indicating that colloids are safe to use contrary to previous studies (Blake, 2011).  It is therefore imperative to recognize these instances of misconduct and uproot them from the scientific community. The article is a review that looks into the articles dealing with scientific misconduct to develop an overview of the subject at hand. These incidents can be detrimental to the health and well-being of human beings. It can hinder progress as well as cause untold harm by the re-emergence of diseases that have already been conquered. It is recommended that we foster a culture of scientific integrity where everyone is aware of the importance of this issue. Moreover, journals can be more diligent in their reviews and reliant on peer reviews.  

    Key words: science, scientific method, theory, misconduct, liability of misconduct

    ​Download link: Article 5.pdf

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/RDKU3775

    ​

    Teaching the political speech at secondary level schools. Towards critical and digital literacy.​


    Author:  Dr. Georgios Alexandropoulos

    Postdoc researcher at the University of Thessaly

    Teacher in public education

    gealexandr@phil.uth.gr​


    In this study, I present the teaching approach of political discourse to high school students, aged 17-18 (secondary level education in Greece). Through this didactic scenario students will acquire the knowledge required for political communication, political discourse, persuasion techniques and means. In addition, through this teaching scenario, students will be led not only to critical thinking but also to digital literacy.

    Key words: teaching, political speech and communication, secondary level education, critical and digital literacy.

    ​Download link: ​Article 6.pdf

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/STSL9113​


    We Shape the Shapers of the Future

    AOU Is The Right Place for You to Grow

    AOU Logo
    Beirut
    • Arab Open University - Lebanon
      Omar Bayhum street, Tayouneh, Beirut
    •   View Map
    • +(961) 01-39 21 39
    • +(961) 01-39 21 46
    • info@aou.edu.lb
    Antelias
    • Arab Open University - Lebanon Antelias
    •  View Map
    • +(961) 04-40 41 01
    • info@aou.edu.lb
    Tripoli
    • Arab Open University - Lebanon Tripoli
    •  View Map
    • +(961) 26-40 94 40
    • info@aou.edu.lb

    Copyright 2026 © Arab Open University - Lebanon. All Rights Reserved.
    🍪 This website uses cookies to improve performance and get the best experience on our website. Learn more