• Careers
  • Alumni
  • Giving
  • Media
  • Sign In
SIS | LMS
AOU Logo Apply Now
  • About
  • Academics
  • Admission
  • Students
  • Research
  • Centers

Careers
Alumni
Giving
Media
SIS
LMS
Apply Now
عربي 
Lebanon flag
Back
  • Director Message
  • Vision, Mission and Values
  • Strategic Plan
  • Top Management
  • Centers
  • Organizational Structure
  • Units and Departments
  • OU Partnership
  • Accreditation
  • International Relations
  • Regulations
  • AOU Teaching and Learning Model
  • Publications
  • Gallery
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Projects And Initiatives
  • Sustainable Development
Back
Faculty of Business Studies
Faculty of
Business Studies
Faculty of Computer Studies
Faculty of
Computer Studies
Faculty of Language Studies
Faculty of
Language Studies
Faculty of Education
Faculty of
Education
Graphic and Multimedia Design Technology
Graphic and Multimedia
Design Technology
Back
  • Home
  • Student Services
  • LMS
  • University Bulletins
  • Library & Learning Resources
  • Academic Calendar
  • Student Guide
  • Examinations
  • Students Affairs
  • Student Funds
  • Student Life
  • Student Email
  • FAQs
  • Student Complaint (FAQ)
  • Honor’s List
Back
  • Undergraduate Programs
  • Admission Requirements
  • Tuition Fees
  • Apply
  • FAQ for Admission and Registration
  • Graduate Programs
  • Admission Requirements
  • Tuition Fees
  • Apply
  • FAQ for Admission and Registration
  • Why Study at AOU
  • Terms and Conditions
Back
  • Research
  • Vision and Mission
  • Research & Development Committee
  • Research Centers
  • Meet Our Researchers
  • CALR Linguistics Journal
  • Conferences
  • Highlights
  • Research Bylaws
  • Research Forms
  • Awards
  • Student Research (Theses & Projects)
  • Recent
Back
  • Privacy Note
Back
  • Academic and Continuing Education Center (ACEC)
  • Writing Center
  • English speaking skills center
  • Entrepreneurship Center
Back
  • Donors
  • Why Donate?
  • Where to Give?
  • How to Give?
Back
  • Latest News
  • Events
  • Announcements
  • Success Stories
  • Career Opportunities
    AOU - Lebanon / Research / CALR Linguistics Journal / CALR - Issue 8

CALR Linguistics Journal

CALR Linguistics Journal

  • CALR Linguistics Journal
  • CALR publication ethics and malpractice statement
  • CALR Issues
    • CALR - Volume 16-Issue 2
    • CALR - Volume 16-Issue 1
    • CALR - Issue 15
    • CALR - Issue 14
    • CALR - Issue 13
    • CALR - Issue 12
    • CALR - Issue 11
    • CALR - Issue 10
    • CALR - Issue 9
    • CALR - Issue 8
    • CALR - Issue 7 Annex
    • CALR - Issue 7
    • CALR - Issue 6
    • CALR - Issue 5
    • CALR - Issue 4
    • CALR - Issue 3
    • CALR - Issue 2
    • CALR - Issue 1
  • CALR about
  • Call for Papers
  • Board & Affiliation
  • Author's guide
  • Online Resources
  • Gallery
  • Recent
    • Conference Call for Papers
    Toggle Sidebar

    CALR - Issue 8

    • WhatsApp
    • Copy Link
    Link copied!
    Page Image
    Page Content


    CALR ISSUE 8.jpg
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/BABZ9746​

     

    LIST OF ARTICLES

    An empirical study of business request emails in the context of Business English as a Lingua Franca

    Author: Dr Liang Liao, Jiangxi University, China
    liaol@uni.coventry.ac.uk
    Professor Hilary Nesi, Coventry University, United Kingdom
    aa3861@coventry.ac.uk

    Abstract: This paper reports on a linguistic analysis of request emails written in English by young Business English (BE) graduates working in trading companies in China. The emails were extracted from a corpus of 307 messages (34,837 words) between these graduates and their clients around the world, mostly in countries where English is only used as a Lingua Franca. The BE graduates often dealt with multiple clients simultaneously, under considerable time constraints, and made use of templates and prefabricated phrases to speed up the writing process. The findings have interesting implications for English language teaching and the teaching of Business English as a Lingua Franca (BELF). The writers of the emails collected for this study clearly had a restricted command of English, and for this reason English language teachers might be unwilling to use authentic texts of this kind as models for their students’ writing. However, BELF usage may help to achieve business writers’ purposes more effectively than ‘textbook English’, and there may be a case for concentrating, in the Business English classroom, less on grammar and more on ways to minimise the risk of losing face.
    Keywords: BELF; English as a Lingua Franca; business requests; email; Business English; English for Professional Purposes

    Download link:Article 1 (PDF)

    ​DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/WCPY4154​


    Ways forward for developing an ELF centred ELT Pedagogy

    Author: Dr Robert Weekly
    Nottingham Ningbo University, China
    rj.weekly42@gmail.com

    Abstract: This paper presents a theoretical argument to augment current approaches which could serve as a basis for an English as a Lingua Franca (ELF) orientated pedagogy in ELT. There are four conceptual areas of teaching practices in ELT which have created tension between the language expected in the classroom and the socio-linguistic reality outside the classroom. These are translanguaging, the target language model, corrective feedback and assessment practices. Firstly, translanguaging in educational contexts has been extensively researched recently but not linked explicitly to ELF, though these research fields share an ontological and epistemically framework. Secondly, the principle problem with models used in ELT, is to subjugate the spoken language with the written. Therefore, these two different forms of language need explicit separation, and for speaking, where appropriate, a local model used, while at the same time, implicitly raising awareness of societal attitudes towards dialects and accents. Thirdly, corrective feedback (CF) requires a reorientation from an accuracy focused CF towards meaning focused correction. Finally, assessment practices, which for speaking, measure students spoken language against native models and does not accurately reflect students’ language competence. These four aspects would also serve as a basis for differentiating an ELF approach to ELT from a CLT approach.
     
    Key Words:KeyWords: ELF, Pedagogy, Translanguaging, Corrective Feedback, Assessment

    Download link:Article 2 (PDF)

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/ZITN5363


    EVOLVING ATTITUDES TOWARDS NON-NATIVE SPEAKER TEACHERS OF ENGLISH

    Author: Jane Jenvey
    Kings College
    University of London
    jane.jenvey@kcl.ac.uk

    Abstract: This paper is a discussion of a study into attitudes towards NNS teachers of ESOL in a London college of further education. Attitude towards ‘non-native’ speaker teachers of English is a heated topic because, ‘on a global level the ELT profession is perhaps the world’s only profession in which the majority face discrimination’ (Ali, 2009 p.37). It is not only the problem of discrimination which reflects poorly on the ELT profession but also the negative consequences of the strongly held ‘birthright mentality’ (Thomas, 1999 p.6). The data consists of seven semi-structured interviews with members of staff. The survey and the interviews confirm that there is little evidence that NNS teachers at this London are discriminated against by teacher trainers or colleagues. This is a challenge to the idea that NNS teachers are always and everywhere disadvantaged. Teacher learners should be made aware that ‘native speakerism’ or the ‘native speaker fallacy’ has no place in ELT and is not inevitable. Furthermore, there is no pedagogical basis for the notion that a native speaker teacher possesses any innate ability to teach more competently.
     
    KeyWordsnative speakerism, NNS teachers, ESOL, ELT.

    Download link:Article 3 (PDF)

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/JAVG8495​


    EFL Learners' Receptive and Productive Knowledge of Word Derivatives

    Author: Dr Faisal Al-Homoud
    Department of English and literature,
    College of Languages and Translation
    Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU),
    Saudi Arabia
    e-mail: faah26@gmail.com,
    faalhomoud@imamu.edu.sa

    Abstract: It has been assumed that L2 learners' productive knowledge of word derivatives is not predicted by their receptive knowledge, that is, learners with high levels of receptive knowledge may not be better than learners with low level of receptive knowledge in the production of word derivatives (e.g. Schmitt & Zimmerman, 2002; Collins & Nation, 2015). However, the current study does not conform to this notion, and provides new insights about EFL learners' receptive and productive knowledge of word derivative forms. The participants of the present study were 36 postgraduate students at ten different Saudi universities majoring in different schemes of English. They were requested to take an English-Arabic translation task for 16 target words, and to fill in four blanks for each target word with a suitable word derivative class (i.e. a noun, verb, adjective, or adverb). Each blank appeared in a contextualized sentence, where the participants were required to provide a suitable derivative for each blank. Each target word had four sentences with blanks that required one of the four major word classes mentioned above. These 16 words came from Schmitt and Zimmerman's (2002) study. The results showed that there is a significant correlation between the participants' receptive and productive knowledge. Furthermore, the results indicated that adjectives and nouns were the most provided derivatives on the Schmitt and Zimmerman's derivative forms test, followed by verbs and adverbs. Finally, some pedagogical implications were provided to help L2 learners increase their receptive as well as productive knowledge aspects of word derivations.
    Key WordsDerivatives, receptive knowledge, productive knowledge, vocabulary size, breadth and depth knowledge

    Download link:Article 4 (PDF)

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.60149/ADIW2935​​​

    ​​​

    We Shape the Shapers of the Future

    AOU Is The Right Place for You to Grow

    AOU Logo
    Beirut
    • Arab Open University - Lebanon
      Omar Bayhum street, Tayouneh, Beirut
    •   View Map
    • +(961) 01-39 21 39
    • +(961) 01-39 21 46
    • info@aou.edu.lb
    Antelias
    • Arab Open University - Lebanon Antelias
    •  View Map
    • +(961) 04-40 41 01
    • info@aou.edu.lb
    Tripoli
    • Arab Open University - Lebanon Tripoli
    •  View Map
    • +(961) 26-40 94 40
    • info@aou.edu.lb

    Copyright 2026 © Arab Open University - Lebanon. All Rights Reserved.
    🍪 This website uses cookies to improve performance and get the best experience on our website. Learn more